Radical Right “Comes Out” in Colorado School District

 

Facts do not lie                          Students protest proposed AP History changes

 

 

 

With roots in the historic Biblical concepts of Apocalypse and evil, a highly  charged controversy has broken out in the Jefferson County School District, a predominantly middle class county on the western edge of Denver.

This controversy has its roots in fear, a fear that if not met with honesty and truth, will convulse our state.

Following their election as conservative co-candidates ten months ago, three new members joined two sitting mainline members on the School Board in the second largest district in Colorado.  Their campaign claim that the district needed to pay attention to student achievement sounded innocent enough.  However, from the outset, vexing issues like teacher pay, charter schools, union-district relations, and job security have rumbled.  Now, their true agenda is “coming out.”  The mission is to reform the way American history is taught by changing its content so as to ignore the bad and the ugly.  The DENVER POST sums it up in graphic terms.

In a move two weeks ago that has galvanized teachers, students, the College Board, and parents alike, Julie Williams, one of the new conservative board members, introduced a resolution that would revolutionize the way history is taught in the District.  William’s proposal calls for presenting only “positive aspects” of U.S. heritage that “promote citizenship, patriotism, benefits of the free enterprise system, respect for authority and respect for individual rights, and don’t “encourage or condone civil disorder, social strike or disregard of the law.”

Williams recently criticized how history is currently taught, saying, “It has an emphasis on race, gender, class, ethnicity, grievance and American-bashing while simultaneously omitting the most basic structural and philosophical elements considered essential to the understanding of American History for generations.”

At the heart of the current dispute is the question of whether all of the nation’s history, good and bad, should be taught.  Given the proposed resolution, a whole series of instructive negative events would be avoided.  There is the story of how the government totally disenfranchised the Indians of their lands and rights.  There is the story of racism that led to the Civil War and continues today.  There is the story of how President Reagan gutted funds for poverty and social programs while dramatically increasing support for the questionable military action in Iraq.  There is the story of the huge Bush era tax cuts for the rich.  There is the current story of the dramatically increasing number of children living in poverty.

Perhaps the worst story for twenty first century America is the Radical Right’s absolute commitment to unfettered capitalism and absolute free enterprise, under which the rich get the power while the poor learn the true meaning of suffering.

Jesus was confronted by this kind of self-justifying motivation wherever he went.  The Book of Mark recalls an exchange between Jesus and a Rich Young Ruler.  “As Jesus was setting out on a journey, a man ran up to him and knelt before him, and asked him, “Good Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?” And Jesus said to him, “Why do you call Me good? No one is good except God alone. 19 You know the commandments, ‘Do not murder, Do not commit adultery, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Do not defraud, Honor your father and mother.’” 20 And he said to Jesus, “Teacher, I have kept all these things from my youth up.” 21 Looking at him, Jesus felt a love for him and said to him, “One thing you lack: go and sell all you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me.” But at these words he was saddened, and he went away grieving, for he was one who owned much property.  And Jesus, looking around, said to his disciples, “How hard it will be for those who are wealthy to enter the kingdom of God!”

Why does the Radical Right want to eliminate these stories of conflict in American history?  Its proponents want to restore the myth that America is the most upright, peace-loving nation on earth.  They would like to avoid having to face homophobia, racism, economic disparity, and poverty.  They would like to posture themselves as “God’s Chosen People.”

People often think they’re Christian because they use the Bible to value their lives and judge others.  But in Matthew, Jesus says to his disciples, “If anyone wishes to come after me, he must deny himself, and take up his cross and follow me.  “For whoever wishes to save his life will lose it; but whoever loses his life for my sake will find it”  Jesus’ call to follow him is more than an invitation to pray a prayer. .It is a summons to lose your life finding new life for people in all walks of life.

Where does this irrational desire for emphasizing only the positive come from?  Religiously and spiritually it comes from fear, fear of death, fear of eternal condemnation, fear of loss of lifestyle, fear of the challenges of tomorrow, and ultimately fear of God’s judgment.  These fears add up to an hysteria about the end of time, called the Apocalypse, when God will save the good people and destroy the wicked.  The Radical Right is currently engaged in posturing itself as the beloved community and condemning those who don’t look or think like they do.

By blaming a society’s victims for causing their own plight and suffering, those in power believe they’ll enjoy eternal life.  Thus, the school board is pushing for telling only a positive story about our American heritage.  Unfortunately, it’s generally a story about white male power.  They don’t want anyone to think critically or to take action against their apocalypse-driven agenda.

This “coming out” of the Jefferson County School Board is not something that’s being taken lightly.  Teachers are calling in sick, thus forcing the closing of schools.  Yesterday, it was announced that these teachers are being threatened with loss of pay.   Students by the thousands are demonstrating throughout the county, and are being highly criticized by the conservative press.   This controversy is not going to subside easily or quickly.  Vincent Carroll, DENVER POST Editor has a very clear perspective on the ideological conflict.

The theological question of evil arises here.  Are these school board members evil?  Absolutely not!  They aren’t even bad people.  But when a national movement, of which they are a part, seeks to deny a human history that includes evil treatment of the disenfranchised by the powerful, evil is at work extending the myth that God loves only certain people.  Evil is at work dividing people who should be about the business of caring for the whole human community.

The resolution of this crisis will come only when its victims, students, teachers, parents and the critical-thinking larger community both challenge and embrace the fear-driven school board and its supporters.  The mission here is for everyone to acknowledge that life is filled with ambiguities and suffering, and then to create social structures that work for everyone.

Why Are We So Divided?

Why Are We So Divided?

SEPTEMBER 21, 2014

ROBBLAPP

LEAVE A COMMENT

America is running around 50% “Let’s fix things for everyone,” and 50%, “Let’s fix things to enhance my power.” This guarantees no solutions will be found.

Not transforming our society into one that works for everyone is a tragedy.

We find voices on each side in Colorado.  For example, Conservative Cory Gardner says we should cut government spending on the poor.  Conversely, more Liberal Mark Udall trailed off in support of big energy. Both these opposing voices fly in the face of Christian Biblical teachings.  One good place to start is with the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth on the Kingdom of God.

Jesus, in keeping with the beliefs of Old Testament Prophets, believed that the Kingdom of God is a state of being in which all people love and respect one another, caring for the disenfranchised, and eschewing strategies and claims for power.

In this mandate for equal sharing of life’s goods, Jesus called on everyone to care for his or her neighbor, sometimes at great sacrifice.

Whether today’s politicians clamor for reduction in government spending for the health and welfare of everyone, or enact legislation that reinforces the power and wealth of the rich, they are missing Jesus’ call for the creation of a healthy and just community.

Instead of being divided 50/50 over how to wreck the human enterprise as envisioned by Jesus, we need to come together with common goals.

Until we as a Colorado community do this we will never arrive at sane solutions, solutions which, of course, will require everyone giving up a little on her or his goals in favor of the common good.

Being an “Aginner” Never Housed a Single Homeless Person

 

Homeless-Family

Today’s political campaigners appear to favor homelessness!

In the heat of this midterm election, candidates are telling us only what they are against.  Mostly, that sounds like not fixing anything.

This means we are guaranteed to elect people who don’t know how to solve problems, only to cause them.

I have been an affordable housing activist for a very long time in both religious and secular circles. Solving the problem of homelessness takes leadership creativity and community cooperation.

Politicians don’t seem to notice that more and more people, increasing numbers of them women and children, are trying to find comfort and safety in crannies along our city streets.

Negative political ads on the TV set in my kitchen exhibit candidates on both sides trying to make points with voters by claiming their opponents can not lead America to suitable solutions.  The most striking theme of these ads is candidates blathering about how their plans will miraculously save America and the world while spending less money.

This is not leadership.  These people are combatants, each committed to winning, no matter how unreasonable and divisive are their “solutions.”

We need to move to a new model of leadership.  I call this a “Genesis Model” where people find ways to coexist creatively so that everyone can have a fair chance, one of God’s Genesis promises.

While the Genesis story of creation moves quickly to the loss of innocence in “the fall, on the seventh day God rested and was pleased.  God recognized that no human would be perfect, but God promised that people could and would work things out, no matter the severity of the conflict.  The story of Cain and Abel reveals the deep struggle that persists in human efforts to resolve differences, even unto death.  But this is part of God’s world.  It requires transformative leadership in changing the ways people solve their problems.

Transformative leaders listen more often than they tell.  Transformative leadership is about hearing with new ears the passions and pains of the world about us.  It is about creating spaces where God’s new earth can be reborn.

Transformative leaders, as they listen and dream, do not have preconceived notions of outcomes.  Everyone at the table gets to brainstorm new ways of being.  Power is not the driver.  Solutions in many ways are temporary; they are steps toward even more productive transformations in the way we are with each other, the world over.

When we can get to this point in our consideration of leadership, we will have recognized that being a transformative leader is not about finding the magic bullet that fixes everything.

And, we will stop emphasizing the negative political rhetoric that does nothing but reinforce our differences.

 

Ministerial Courage

A Nazarene of long ago was murdered for his witness on behalf of the powerless and oppressed.  That is courage!.

But what does courage look like today in the face of all the church and political polarization of our times, the growing negative economic impact of the 1% – 99% in America, and the re-emergence of war as the world’s empire problem solving device?

The United Church of Christ, of which I am a long term ordained member and leader, talks about “courage in the struggle” in its statement of faith. Do we really know what courage is?

Courage today is a lot like the courage of the Nazarene of long ago, being willing to witness on behalf of of the powerless and oppressed.

It is important, however, not only to seek the courage of Jesus of Nazareth, but to follow the model of how he witnessed to make effective change.

How did Jesus of Nazareth negotiate this?  We get some big clues from the Sermon on the Mount, where Jesus teaches us, “Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy.”  Jesus was all about a God who cares for all the people, a God who calls for reconciliation, a God who sees justice and mercy as being the birthright of every human being.

Here in the 14th year of the twentieth first century, there seem increasingly to be two models for viewing at the human race and for behaving as part of it.  We are seeing both everywhere we look.

Those following one model appear to view most people, groups, governing authorities, and philosophies as the enemy. Those in the contrasting group try to live as though disparate interests can be brought together and that ones major task is to reach out in accommodation and compromise, if not love.

There can be no question about the fact that in our culture, in our politics, and in our religious beliefs, there are many for whom communication is becoming increasingly uncivilized.  Opponents are shouting more loudly than ever before.  Screaming and yelling on-line is the life work of many idealogues, no matter how little thought they have given to the great moral and human implications of their calls to “do it” their way.

Similarly, there is no question that, a significant number in our society are recognizing that life won’t work without a caring for the least of these among us, and action to change the root causes of the divisiveness of life.

Both models are represented everywhere one looks – in churches,  in the press, in social media, in neighborhoods, and in politics.  And, because of the overwhelming energy being poured into critiquing negatively the human enterprise, there is dramatic need for courage among those who would sow peace and love.

It is time for clergy and laity to find new courage to espouse and live the model of caring for the least of these among us, and taking action to change the root causes of the divisiveness of life.

Surely,as United Churches are engaging more than ever in reaching out with social services, we’re headed in the right direction.  But clergy and laity alike need to find their voices for transforming society into a single family that can negotiate its differences.  This must be a voice of forgiveness, of incense at structural injustice, and most of all of love for the most disagreeable among us.  This will take sacrifice and selflessness.